Synthetic data is artificial data generated by algorithms, statistical models, or simulations, rather than collected from real-world events or people, engineered to mirror the statistical patterns of a real "seed" dataset without containing any actual individual's records. NIST defines synthetic data generation as the process of using seed data "to create artificial data that have some of the statistical characteristics of the seed data." In AI governance, synthetic data matters because it offers a way to train, augment, and test models when real data is scarce, imbalanced, or restricted by privacy law, Gartner projected in 2021 that synthetic sources would supply 60% of AI and analytics training data by 2024, up from 1% in 2021; that was a forecast about a year now past, not a measurement, and Gartner has not published an outturn against it. But synthetic data is not a governance free pass: NIST's Generative AI Profile and a 2024 peer-reviewed study in Nature both document how models trained repeatedly on synthetic output can suffer "model collapse," a progressive loss of quality and diversity, while poorly generated synthetic data can just as easily inherit or amplify the biases of its source.
Run the free AI Health CheckSynthetic Data, artificial data generated by an algorithm, statistical model, or simulation, rather than collected from real-world events or people, designed to reproduce the statistical patterns of a real ('seed') dataset without containing any actual individual's records.
Synthetic data lets AI teams train, test, and share models without exposing real people's personal information, and it can fill gaps where real data is scarce, imbalanced, or legally restricted. Governance teams need to watch two failure modes, though: models trained repeatedly on their own synthetic output can degrade in quality and diversity ("model collapse"), and synthetic data can still leak identifiable patterns or bake in the biases of whatever data or model produced it.
Source: NIST SP 800-188 / NISTIR 8053, "synthetic data generation" (csrc.nist.gov glossary)
Privacy-preserving training data
Generating artificial records that mirror the statistical structure of sensitive datasets (health records, financial transactions, personal identifiers) so models can be trained or shared without exposing real individuals, often combined with differential-privacy techniques applied during generation.
Data augmentation
Expanding thin or imbalanced datasets, for example rare disease cases or minority-class fraud examples, with generated examples so models see enough variety to learn robust, generalizable patterns.
Software and model testing
Producing realistic test datasets for QA, stress-testing, and edge-case simulation without needing production data or waiting for real incidents to occur naturally.
Bias detection and rebalancing
Creating supplementary examples for underrepresented groups or scenarios to help surface and correct skewed training distributions before deployment.
Cross-organization data sharing
Allowing organizations to share representative datasets with researchers, vendors, or regulators when the original data cannot leave the organization for privacy or competitive reasons.
Model collapse
Nature-published research (Shumailov et al., 2024) found that generative models trained recursively on their own synthetic output progressively lose the tails of the original data distribution, degrading diversity and quality over successive generations, a risk NIST's Generative AI Profile (AI 600-1) now flags explicitly.
Bias and quality amplification
Synthetic data generated from a biased model or a skewed seed dataset can reproduce, and in some cases exaggerate, that same skew. NIST groups this under "harmful bias and homogenization" in its Generative AI Profile risk taxonomy.
Residual privacy leakage
Because generative models such as GANs can memorize training examples, synthetic outputs can still leak identifiable patterns from real records unless privacy-preserving techniques (e.g., differentially private GANs) are deliberately built into generation.
Fidelity and traceability gaps
Quality frameworks for synthetic data emphasize verisimilitude (how closely it matches real-world structure), consistency, and traceability (being able to track how and from what it was generated), weak provenance makes downstream model behavior hard to audit.
Undisclosed synthetic content
NIST AI 100-4 addresses the broader risk that AI-generated ("synthetic") content, images, audio, text, can be passed off as authentic without disclosure, undermining transparency and public trust.
Common generation methods include generative adversarial networks (GANs) and diffusion models for images and structured records, large language models for synthetic text and dialogue, agent-based or statistical simulations for tabular and time-series data, and simpler parametric or resampling methods for smaller datasets. The right method depends on the data type, the fidelity required, and whether privacy protection needs to be engineered directly into the generation process rather than added afterward.
Because raw generative models can memorize and leak fragments of their training data, researchers have developed privacy-preserving variants, such as differentially private GANs, that add calibrated noise during training so the resulting synthetic records cannot be traced back to any single real individual. These techniques matter most for regulated data like health or financial records, where "synthetic" alone is not a legal or technical guarantee of privacy.
What is synthetic data in AI, in simple terms?
It's artificial data created by an algorithm, model, or simulation to imitate the statistical patterns of real data, without containing any actual real-world records. NIST describes synthetic data generation as using seed data "to create artificial data that have some of the statistical characteristics of the seed data."
Is synthetic data as good as real-world data for training AI?
It's very useful for augmentation, testing, and privacy protection, but quality depends heavily on the generation method and seed data. Research published in Nature in 2024 showed that repeatedly training generative models on their own synthetic output, instead of mixing in fresh real-world data, can cause measurable degradation in output diversity and quality over successive generations.
What is model collapse and why does it matter for AI governance?
Model collapse is the progressive degradation of a generative model's outputs when it is trained recursively on data produced by earlier AI models rather than real-world data. Shumailov et al.'s 2024 Nature paper showed this causes models to lose rare, minority patterns from the true data distribution, converging toward narrower, lower-quality output, a risk NIST's Generative AI Profile (AI 600-1) now explicitly tracks under bias and homogenization.
Does synthetic data eliminate privacy risk?
Not automatically. Generative models such as GANs can memorize and reproduce fragments of their training data, so poorly generated synthetic data can still leak identifiable information. Meaningful privacy protection generally requires deliberately building in techniques like differential privacy during generation, not just labeling the output "synthetic."
How is synthetic data different from anonymized or de-identified data?
Anonymized or de-identified data starts as real records with identifiers removed or masked, so its re-identification risk depends on how thoroughly it was stripped. Synthetic data is generated from scratch by a model or algorithm and is not itself a copy of real records, though it must still be checked for whether it inadvertently reproduces identifiable patterns from its training source.
How much AI training data today is synthetic?
Precise, independently verified figures are scarce, but a widely cited 2021 Gartner forecast projected that synthetic sources would supply 60% of data used in AI and analytics development by 2024, up from about 1% in 2021. That trend is a key reason governance frameworks now treat synthetic data as a first-class risk category rather than a footnote.
Last reviewed July 2026
This page is general information about What Is Synthetic Data?, not legal, regulatory, or professional advice, and does not capture every nuance or exception. Requirements change and can be fact-specific. Always verify against primary sources and your own qualified legal counsel before relying on it.